Saturday 24 November 2012

THE FEIGNING BRAWL OF AN IMPOSTOR



        Creative writers are freedom of writing to express the foible and weakness of the society. It is one of the fundamental rights of man. The feigning brawl of an impostor is an essay, which shows how a dogmatic person who interferes the liberty of a creative writers and betrays his own ignorance.
       Mr. K -tea is the editor of the magazine called the mirror. One morning a strange person in dark complexion named Mr. rope rushes into his room. He is a drunkard having a heavy paunch and thick moustache. He begins to quarrel with him. He accuses the editor that he has written and published a worst article about him in his journal. He also charges the editor for describing him as untruthful and touchy and as a dove feathered raven flying about polluting the society with venom.
       Mr. K – tea refuses to accept the charges and he tries to convince him. But Mr. Rope Is arrogant and vulgar in his argument. He blames the editor of being spiteful because he cannot tolerate the princely life and popularity of Mr. Rope he threatens to destroy the press. Finally he requests the editor to give a guarantee to stop writing about him.
       The writer chides his stupidity of comparing himself with an imaginary character. He tells him that Shakespeare, Shaw, Stevenson, Dumas Scott and Tagore have written about reality. Reality cannot be rejected and hated. No writer can escape from reality when he attempts to tell a story or create a character.
          The foibles and dirty aspects of society cannot be avoided from the eyes of satirical and imaginative writers. He creates only an imaginative character to reform the society. If some individual imagines that the character is an attack against him he only is to be blamed and not the imaginative writer.
          In conclusion, Mr. K-tea declares the freedom of the creative writer. When people have freedom to act as they like the creative writers have the liberty to write as they think ,so there is no reason to interfere in the freedom of inventive writer.                   

No comments:

Post a Comment